(Bloomberg Opinion) — Global central bankers have ducked a chance to push for tightborrowing constraints on the biggest hedge funds, whose importance to core government bond and other financial markets has grown enormously in the past decade. Such funds are at the center of so-called shadow banking, where the use of borrowed money and derivatives is atroublingsource of instability that can hurt not only sophisticated investors, but also the pricing and supply of funding to all areas of the economy.
In a world of ever-expanding public debt and volatile politics, it is imperative that policymakers get their arms around thispotential epicenter of the next financial crisis, but they remain frustrated by a lack of data and hampered by the lobbying power of the global asset management industry. Hedge funds, dealer banks and others continue to resist calls for more financial reporting and disclosure.The policymakers at the Financial Stability Board have watered down earlier proposals forgreatertransparency in favor of working with industry to protect confidentialinformation.
There should be a tradeoff to this: Without the timely detail that would help central banks monitor risks and supervise markets, regulators must impose tougher rules to protect economies.
The FSB, which meets inBasel,Switzerland, hasbeen examining the scale and effects of borrowed money across non-bank, market-based finance since several small and large crises between 2020 and 2022 highlighted its power to cause damage. They havedug into vulnerabilities among insurers, pensionand mutual funds as well as the hedge funds that are the most dynamic and use the greatest leverage to amplify the impact of their trades. In the US, the total borrowing by hedge funds hit fresh records of more than $5.5trillion at the end of March.
Also on Wednesday, theBank of England warned about the risks of hedge funds playing an ever-bigger role in UK gilt markets in its twice-yearly financial stability report. It said that a small number of very big funds accounted for 90% of borrowing to turbocharge their bond trading and that the opaque nature of their activities worsened the threat of destabilizing selloffs.
The FSB’s final report on leverage in non-bank financial intermediation – the technocratic term for shadow banks’ use of borrowed money – published Wednesday, offered a smorgasbord of recommendations from which watchdogs around the world are meant to pick and choose the most relevant, or politically palatable, options.
The FSB hopesthat a package of elements can produce safer markets. These includebetter and more public data to help all investors better assess the risks being takenin markets;more cross-border cooperation between authorities to shareinformation; more centralized clearing of trades and financing;and potentially some limits on the leverage that can be used within certain markets or by certain funds.
However, large, complex hedge funds have successfully campaigned against central bankers relying on firmerborrowing restrictions either on specific trades, or on funds themselves. The final FSB report ends up warning local regulators to be careful with leverage limits to ensure that they avoid losing liquidity or increasing costs in core markets like government bonds.
Regulators face difficulties here because the greater roleof hedge funds is a consequence of tougher rules for banks following the 2008 globalfinancial crisis. That forced investment banks to slash leverage and blocked themfrom making bets on markets with borrowed money.
The US is trying to improve resilience in Treasury markets partly by loosening regulations for banks.Leverage ratio reforms being pushed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent should help by giving dealers more balance sheet capacity for low-risk assets like sovereign debt.It will also help them lend more to hedge funds and should make them more able to take up the slack when there is heavy selling byleveraged investors.
The US and other jurisdictions are also pushing more government bond trading and repo financing towards central clearinghouses, which charge borrowers a margin that reduces how much they can borrow. But these moves have faced delays.
Still, leverage limits on big hedge funds should be a key tool for central banks, especially in the US and UK where their role is most significant. A simple limit that doesn’t take account of the riskiness of the assets a fund holds is too blunt and could encourage them to put more money in higher risk bets to maximize returns. Instead what’s needed isa regime ofrisk-based leverage guardrails, along with rules around how much cash funds should keep asideto meet repayment requests or margin calls on losing trades. This would helpensure their complex, multi-asset and interconnected books of investments are better able to withstand stress withoutsparking wildfires of losses through markets.
Hedge funds and other asset managers argue thatsuch restraintswould treatthem likebanks, which are funded with deposits and whose failures can createbigger systemic problems than a failing fund ever would. But that’s only half the story.For hedge funds and the broader shadow banking system rely onmoney market funds to play the role of deposits, supplying short-termcash tofinancelonger-term bets. This system does suffer bank-like runs on its funding, which lead to credit crunches and real pain for economies, forcing central banks to step in with taxpayer-backed support, asI argued in an April feature.
The idea that better data and monitoring – by central banks and investors and lenders across markets – will offer better defenses against future crises is a hopeful one. It is also a long way from being realized. This year has already seen several troubling selloffs in giltsand Treasuriesthat central bankers and investors have struggled to understand in real time. The problems exist now. Policymakers need to get a grip.
More From Bloomberg Opinion:
This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Paul J. Davies is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering banking and finance. Previously, he was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com/opinion
About The Author
